The Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Potential Pearls and Pitfalls in Daily Practice
The Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Potential Pearls and Pitfalls in Daily Practice |
”The survival of patients with small PDACs (particularly ≤ 20 mm), 30% at 5 years, is better than it is for patients with larger cancers. However, small tumors are the most difficult to visualize and the sensitivity of MDCT is lower for detection of small PDACs. In a retrospective study by Yoon et al. with 33 PDAC patients who underwent CT prior to the diagnosis of PDAC, the tumor could be identified in 72.7% (24/33) of cases. Of these prospectively missed cases, 87.5% (21/24) were ≤ 20 mm and 12.5% (3/24) were between 21 and 33 mm.” Pitfalls in the MDCT of pancreatic cancer: strategies for minimizing errors Arya Haj‐Mirzaian · Satomi Kawamoto · Atif Zaheer · Ralph H. Hruban · Elliot K. Fishman · Linda C. Chu Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Feb;45(2):457-478 |
Pancreatic Cancer (Uncinate) |
Adenocarcinoma Pancreas 1cm |
“ In the daily radiology practice, the rate of interpretation error is between 3% and 4%; however, of the radiology studies that contain abnormalities, the error rate is even higher, averaging in the 30% range.” Fool Me Twice: Delayed Diagnoses in Radiology With Emphasis on Perpetuated Errors Kim YW, Mansfield LT AJR 2014;202:465-470 |
A Pancreatic Mass Pitfalls Can Occur in Any Part of the Pancreas
|
Potential Pitfalls in The Pancreatic Head Region
|
Useful imaging features to prevent errors in diagnosis
|
Dilated CBD with Distal Transition
|
1cm Stone in CBD Causes Jaundice |
Dilated Pancreatic Duct with Abrupt Cutoff
|
PNET Obstructs Pancreatic Duct |
Pancreatic Masses That Are Not Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
|
IPMN with Chronic Pancreatitis and Looks Like cancer |