“ Radiology departments are encouraged to develop reliable means of identifying challenging and missed diagnoses and using these cases as an education resource in an ongoing effort to mitigate misdiagnosis. A monthly CME conference with pathology and/or surgical correlation and clinical follow-up is an excellent means of providing meaningful peer review to improve practice of the entire division and reduce interpretative errors.”
Mitigating Misdiagnosis in Radiology: Educational CT CME Case Conference for Peer Review and Interpretative Improvement
Pamela T. Johnson, MD, , David Badger, MD, Karen M. Horton, MD, Elliot K. Fishman, MD
JACR: Volume 13, Issue 10, October 2016, Pages 1244–1246

“As opposed to standard peer review, where the reviewing radiologist informs the primary reader that he or she believes a diagnosis was missed or an interpretation provided the wrong information, a CT case conference that includes correlation with other diagnostic information (pathology, surgical findings, clinical follow-up) provides accurate peer review based on gold standards, from which everyone in the division can learn to improve their interpretative skills.”
Mitigating Misdiagnosis in Radiology: Educational CT CME Case Conference for Peer Review and Interpretative Improvement
Pamela T. Johnson, MD, , David Badger, MD, Karen M. Horton, MD, Elliot K. Fishman, MD
JACR: Volume 13, Issue 10, October 2016, Pages 1244–1246

“We advocate the use of checklists for different types of radiologic examinations, depending on the body part imaged, to facilitate active search patterns to decrease the incidence of this type of error.”
Fool Me Twice: Delayed Diagnoses in Radiology With Emphasis on Perpetuated Errors
Kim YW, Mansfield LT
AJR 2014;202:465-470