Pancreatic Mass Detection
|
Pancreatic Mass Detection
|
5 mm Neuroendocrine Tumor HOP |
Do you see a mass? |
Neuroendocrine Tumor HOP Seen Only On Arterial Phase |
Pitfalls in CT Scanning: Wrong Phase of Acquisition
|
PNET Only Seen on Venous Phase with Cinematic Rendering |
Hx- Renal Cell CarcinomaDo you see a pancreatic mass? |
Metastatic RCC to Pancreas only Seen on Arterial Phase |
Right Nephrectomy for Clear Cell RCC: Routine Follow-up |
Challenging Cases: Pancreatitis vs Pancreatic Neoplasms
|
Autoimmune Pancreatitis
|
Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Facts
|
Autoimmune Pancreatitis can be confused with Pancreatic Cancer
|
Autoimmune Pancreatitis: CT Findings
|
Autoimmune Pancreatitis |
Pre and Post Treatment |
Autoimmune Pancreatitis and Renal Involvement |
“ Radiology departments are encouraged to develop reliable means of identifying challenging and missed diagnoses and using these cases as an education resource in an ongoing effort to mitigate misdiagnosis. A monthly CME conference with pathology and/or surgical correlation and clinical follow-up is an excellent means of providing meaningful peer review to improve practice of the entire division and reduce interpretative errors.” Mitigating Misdiagnosis in Radiology: Educational CT CME Case Conference for Peer Review and Interpretative Improvement Pamela T. Johnson, MD, , David Badger, MD, Karen M. Horton, MD, Elliot K. Fishman, MD JACR: Volume 13, Issue 10, October 2016, Pages 1244–1246 |
“As opposed to standard peer review, where the reviewing radiologist informs the primary reader that he or she believes a diagnosis was missed or an interpretation provided the wrong information, a CT case conference that includes correlation with other diagnostic information (pathology, surgical findings, clinical follow-up) provides accurate peer review based on gold standards, from which everyone in the division can learn to improve their interpretative skills.” Mitigating Misdiagnosis in Radiology: Educational CT CME Case Conference for Peer Review and Interpretative Improvement Pamela T. Johnson, MD, , David Badger, MD, Karen M. Horton, MD, Elliot K. Fishman, MD JACR: Volume 13, Issue 10, October 2016, Pages 1244–1246 |
CT Reading and Checklists
|
“We advocate the use of checklists for different types of radiologic examinations, depending on the body part imaged, to facilitate active search patterns to decrease the incidence of this type of error.” Fool Me Twice: Delayed Diagnoses in Radiology With Emphasis on Perpetuated Errors Kim YW, Mansfield LT AJR 2014;202:465-470 |
“This study found that a novel AI algorithm was associated with improved accuracy and AUCs for junior and senior radiologists for detecting pulmonary nodules. Four of 9 radiologists had a lower number of missed and false positive pulmonary nodules with help from AI-aided interpretation of chest radiographs.” An Artificial Intelligence–Based Chest X-ray Model on Human Nodule Detection Accuracy From a Multicenter Study Fatemeh Homayounieh et al. JAMA Network Open. 2021;4(12):e2141096. |
Training the Computer with Organ Segmentation for the Pancreas |
Example of Pancreas Segmentation |