google ads

Case 9

Case 9

49 year old woman status post cytoreductive surgery 2 weeks prior. IV contrast enhanced CT shows:
  1. retained barium in the colon
  2. colonic stent
  3. retained malleable retractor
  4. ingested large metal object

 

Case 9

Case 9

49 year old woman status post cytoreductive surgery 2 weeks prior. IV contrast enhanced CT shows:
  1. retained barium in the colon
  2. colonic stent
  3. retained malleable retractor
  4. ingested large metal object

 

Retained Metal Malleable Retractor

Retained Metal Malleable Retractor
  • A case report in the literature describes asymptomatic intra-abdominal ribbon malleable (similar to this one), removed laparoscopically after 14 years
  • In this case, the most likely interpretation of the radiograph would be that the metal object was on the bed or at the very least outside of the patient

 

Case 10

Case 10

Chest radiograph on a 48 year old man shows:
  1. aortic turbine pump
  2. pH probe in the esophagus
  3. retained epicardial lead
  4. canter tube tip in the esophagus

 

Case 10

Case 10

Chest radiograph on a 48 year old man shows:
  1. aortic turbine pump
  2. pH probe in the esophagus
  3. retained epicardial lead
  4. canter tube tip in the esophagus

 

Wireless capsule pH monitoring device

Wireless capsule pH monitoring device
  • Attached to the esophageal mucosa about 6 cm above the squamo-columnar junction, the location of which is determined by prior endoscopy.
  • Placed with a special delivery device, through nose or mouth, into the esophagus and anchored to the wall with a special system.
  • Should the capsule detach it might be seen elsewhere in the gastrointestinal tract.

 

Case 11

Case 11

55-year-old man with a pancreatic mass and history of recent inguinal hernia repair. Axial (A) and coronal MPR (B) CT images of the pelvis reveal:
  1. retained needle fragment
  2. retained sponge
  3. retained Kelly clamp
  4. mesh status post inguinal hernia repair

 

Case 11

Case 11

55-year-old man with a pancreatic mass and history of recent inguinal hernia repair. Axial (A) and coronal MPR (B) CT images of the pelvis reveal:
  1. retained needle fragment
  2. retained sponge
  3. retained Kelly clamp
  4. mesh status post inguinal hernia repair

 

Retained Surgical Sponge

  • This patient had pain and physical exam findings consistent with foreign body.
  • CT shows a right inguinal abscess and sponge marker within retained surgical sponge.
  • At surgery, opening of the prior hernia repair inguinal incision revealed purulent material in the subcutaneous tissue.
  • Deep to external oblique fascia, a small sponge was located and extracted.  

 

Retained Surgical Sponge

Retained Surgical Sponge

This is another example of how the sponge marker is better displayed with 3D volume rendering

 

Case 12

Case 12

67 year old man w/ampullary adenocarcinoma, status post whipple complicated by gastroduodenal artery hemorrhage necessitating hepatic artery stent. CT performed for follow up showed interval increase in biliary obstruction, narrowing of the portal vein confluence, concerning for recurrent tumor Axial CT and sagittal MPR demonstrate:
  1. ingested razor
  2. retained needle
  3. migrated hepatic artery stent
  4. pancreaticoduodenal stent

 

Case 12

Case 12

67 year old man w/ampullary adenocarcinoma, status post whipple complicated by gastroduodenal artery hemorrhage necessitating hepatic artery stent. CT performed for follow up showed interval increase in biliary obstruction, narrowing of the portal vein confluence, concerning for recurrent tumor Axial CT and sagittal MPR demonstrate:
  1. ingested razor
  2. retained needle
  3. migrated hepatic artery stent
  4. pancreaticoduodenal stent

 

Migrated Hepatic Artery Stent

  • Correct interpretation of this case requires attention to detail.
  • On the 2 images shown, the patient’s hepatic artery stent is oriented perpendicular to the expected location of the hepatic artery.

 

Migrated Hepatic Artery Stent

Migrated Hepatic Artery Stent

  • For comparison, the previous CT is shown, confirming that the enlarging tumor recurrence had dislodged his stent from the hepatic artery.
  • He underwent portal vein stenting to prevent occlusion of his only remaining hepatic arterial blood supply.

 

Case 13

Case 13

Abdominal images on a 60 year old woman show small bowel obstruction and:
  1. retained capsule endoscopy
  2. ingested snap
  3. intraperitoneal chemotherapy pump
  4. bullet

 

Case 13

Case 13

Abdominal images on a 60 year old woman show small bowel obstruction and:
  1. retained capsule endoscopy
  2. ingested snap
  3. intraperitoneal chemotherapy pump
  4. bullet

 

Retained Capsule Endoscopy

Retained Capsule Endoscopy
  • This patient initially presented with nausea and vomiting.  Following negative upper and lower endoscopy, a capsule endoscopy was performed.  
  • The capsule failed to pass, and she was monitored for some time for passage.
  • After 15 months, she developed small bowel obstruction, shown in radiographs and CT images.

 

Retained Capsule Endoscopy

  • Surgery disclosed small bowel carcinoid metastatic to the mesentery.
  • A number of publications have reported retained capsules in the setting of small bowel obstruction
  • Radiologists should not mistake the capsule for other metallic foreign bodies, facilitated by review of patient history and recognition of the appearance on radiographs and CT.

 

Case 14

Case 14

89 year old woman being imaged for melanoma staging. Axial IV contrast enhanced CT shows which of the following:
  1. left ventricular rupture
  2. aortoenteric fistula
  3. apicoaortic graft
  4. small bowel loop in post traumatic diaphragmatic hernia

 

Case 14

Case 14

89 year old woman being imaged for melanoma staging. Axial IV contrast enhanced CT shows which of the following:
  1. left ventricular rupture
  2. aortoenteric fistula
  3. apicoaortic graft
  4. small bowel loop in post traumatic diaphragmatic hernia

 

Apicoaortic Graft

  • This case demonstrates an unusual treatment for left ventricular outflow obstruction: an apicoaortic conduit.
  • Performed in patients who are
    • too high risk for aortic valve replacement either because of morbidity or previous surgeries
    • those with “porcelain aorta” (severely calcified).

 

Apicoaortic Graft

  • Performed with cardiopulmonary bypass, the left ventricular apex is opened and a graft is placed from the apex to the descending thoracic aorta.
  • The postoperative appearance is like an “Aunt Minnie”.
  • The graft courses posteriorly along the left lateral thorax from the cardiac apex to the descending thoracic aorta.

 

Case 15

Case 15

Axial image (A), coronal MPR (B), right sagittal oblique MPR (C) and left sagittal oblique MPR (D) from IV contrast enhanced CT of the pelvis demonstrate:
  1. migrated IUD
  2. tubal ligation clips
  3. calcified tubes due to tuberculosis
  4. hysteroscopic sterilization

 

Case 15

Case 15

Axial image (A), coronal MPR (B), right sagittal oblique MPR (C) and left sagittal oblique MPR (D) from IV contrast enhanced CT of the pelvis demonstrate:
  1. migrated IUD
  2. tubal ligation clips
  3. calcified tubes due to tuberculosis
  4. hysteroscopic sterilization

 

ESSURE Noninvasive Sterilization

  • An alternative to bilateral tubal ligation, a surgical procedure for permanent sterilization, patients can now undergo noninvasive tubal occlusion, also known as ESSURE.
  • In this procedure, the tubes are accessed hysteroscopically via the cervix and endometrial canal..

 

ESSURE Noninvasive Sterilization

  • The microinserts consist of outer and inner coils that expand when deployed into the fallopian tube.
  • It is important to recognize the aim is to position 5-10 mm of the outer coil in the uterine cavity, so that this should not be misconstrued as migration

 

Intraoperative Radiography

  • Multidisciplinary efforts to prevent retention of surgical foreign bodies are essential to patient safety as well as hospital costs.
  • Furthermore, the presence of the retained sponge/instrument is evidence of substandard and negligent care.
  • In cases that lead to allegations of malpractice, although the nursing team is officially responsible for equipment counts, the surgeon will be sued. The principle of res ipsa loquitor (the thing speaks for itself) applies.

 

Intraoperative Radiography

  • Radiologists who miss an object on one of the imaging studies could share in the blame.
  • Additional consideration should be given to the cost for such errors.
  • Hospital admissions for retrieval of retained objects cost $ 60,000 on average and litigation costs $150,000 on average21.

 

Intraoperative Radiography

  • Quality improvement initiatives have been aimed at improving the radiologist’s ability to identify foreign bodies on intraoperative radiographs.
  • Some advocate routinely imaging patients; however, this is tempered by reported sensitivity of radiographs for identifying retained sponges as low as 67%.

 

Intraoperative Radiography

  • While investigating “missed cases” at our institution we found that, not infrequently, the radiologist was unfamiliar with the radiographic appearance of the object thought to be misplaced by the surgical team.
  • At the suggestion of Dr. Melville Williams [personal communication], a Hopkins vascular surgeon, we now provide the radiologist with a positive control image, a radiograph of the surgical foreign body in question.

 

Intraoperative Radiography

Intraoperative Radiography

 

Intraoperative Radiography

Intraoperative Radiography

 

Conclusion

  • Hopefully, we have familiarized you with the appearance of inadvertently retained surgical foreign bodies
  • Beyond the operative setting, correlation with history is essential to determine whether an unexpected foreign body was inadvertently left behind, ingested or introduced by other means
  • Lastly, this exhibit demonstrates medical and surgical innovations that may be encountered at imaging.

 

References

  1. Cima RR, Kollengode A, Garnatz J et al. Incidence and characteristics of potential and actual retained foreign object events in surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 207:80-87.
  2. Gawande AA, Studdert DM, Orav EJ, Brennan TA, Zinner MJ. Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Eng J Med 2003; 348:229-235.
  3. Gibbs VC, Coakley FD, Reines HD. Preventable errors in the operating room: retained foreign bodies after surgery-part 1. Curr Probl Surg 2007; 44:281-337.
  4. Bani-Hani KE, Gharaibeh KA, Yaghan RJ. Retained surgical sponges (gossypiboma). Asian J Surg 2004; 28:109-115.
  5. Ryan JM, Hahn PF, Boland GW, McDowell RK, Saini S, Mueller PR. Percutaneous gastrostomy with T-fastener gastropexy: results of 316 consecutive procedures. Radiology 1997; 203:496-500.
  6. Wan W, Le T, Riskin L, Macario A. Improving safety in the operating room: a systematic literature review of retained surgical sponges. Curr Opin in Anaesthesiology 2009; 22: 207-214.
  7. Manzella A, Filho PB, Albuquerque E, Farias F, Kaercher J. Imaging of gossypibomas: Pictoral review. AJR 2009; 193:S94-S101.
  8. Masura J, Gavora P and Podnar T, Long-term outcome of transcatheter secundum-type atrial septal defect closure using Amplatzer septal occluders. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 505–507.
  9. Garg P, Walton AS. The new world of cardiac interventions: a brief review of the recent advances in non-coronary percutaneous interventions. Heart Lung Circ 2008; 17:186-199. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
  10. Lee T, Tsai IC, Fu YC, Jan SL, Wang CC, Chang Y, Chen MC. MDCT evaluation after closure of atrial septal defect with an Amplatzer septal occluder. AJR 2007; 188:W431-W439.
  11. Joels CS, Sing RF, Heniford BT. Complications of inferior vena cava filters. Am Surg. 2003;69: 654-659.
  12. Sheward SE, Williams AG Jr, Mettler FA Jr, Lacey SR. CT appearance of a surgically retained towel (gossypiboma). J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1986; 10:343-345.
  13. Meyns B, Dens J, Sergeant P et al. Initial experiences with the Impella device in patients with cardiogenic shock. Thorac Cardiov Surg 2003; 51: 312-317.
  14. Rodrigues D, Perez NE, Hammer PM, Webber JD. Laparoscopic removal of a retained intra-abdominal ribbon malleable retractor after 14 years. J Laparoendoscopic Adv Surg Tech 2006; 16:369-371.
  15. Maerten P, Ortner M, Michetti P, Dorta G. Wireless capsule pH monitoring: Does it fulfill all expectations? Digestion 2007: 76:235-240.
  16. Scott WW, Beall DP, Wheeler PS. The retained intrapericardial sponge: value of the lateral chest radiograph. AJR 1998; 171:595-597.
  17. Agrawal GA, Johnson PT, Fishman EK. Intermittent small bowel obstruction with retained endoscopic capsule: MDCT and plain radiographic appearance. Emerg Radiol 2007; 13:319-321.
  18. Cooley DA, Lopez RM, Absi TS. Apicoaortic conduit for left ventricular outflow tract obstruction: revisited. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000; 69:1511-1514.
  19. Lockowandt U. Apicoaortic valved conduit: Potential for progress? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132:796-801.
  20. Wittmer MH, Brown DL, Hartman RP, Famuyide AO, Kawashima A, King BF. Sonography, CT, and MRI appearance of the Essure microinsert permanent birth control device. AJR 2006; 187:959-964.
  21. Regenbogen SE, Greenberg CC, Resch SC et al. Prevention of retained sponges: a decision-analytic model predicting relative cost effectiveness. Surgery 2009; 145:527-535.
  22. Whang G, Mogel GT, Tsai J, Palmer SL. Left behind: Unintentionally retained surgically placed foreign bodies and how to reduce their incidence – Pictoral review. RadioGraphics 2000; 20:1665-1673.
  23. Enker WE, Martz JE, Picon A et al. An incremental step in patient safety: Reducing the risks of retained foreign bodies by the use of an integrated laparotomy pad/retractor. Surg Innov 2008; 15:203.


back

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation. All rights reserved.