Cinematic Rendering of CT Data: Current State of the Art
Cinematic Rendering of CT Data: Current State of the Art Elliot K. Fishman M.D. Johns Hopkins Hospital |
3D Imaging in Radiology: A 40 Year Evolution
|
Computer Hardware
|
Computer Software (Algorithms)
|
CT Scan Datasets
|
Increased clinical experience drive demand
|
LucasFilms 1985 |
“ Volumetric rendering differs from surface rendering in that all the information from the CT scans is preserved, not just surface boundaries. Object thickness and internal contours can be seen in the 3D projection.” Volumetric Rendering Technique: Applications for Three-dimensional Imaging of the Hip Fishman EK, Drebin RA, Ney DR et al. Radiology 1987 Jun;163(3):737-738 |
Volume Rendering Technique-Facts
|
Volume Rendering Technique-Facts
|
Nice Tendons |
Cinematic Rendering
|
The range of visualizations in any case must change to visualize structures ranging from bone, to vasculature to muscle. Here is a case with IVDA and groin infection |
“In addition to the fact that photo-realistic volume renderings tend to be aesthetically more pleasing, it has been shown that realistic lighting contributes to 3D understanding and can improve depth-related task performance . With this work and the implementation that we have made available, we hope to contribute to the uptake of realistic illumination in interactive direct volume rendering applications.” Exposure Render: An Interactive Photo-Realistic Volume Rendering Framework Thomas Kroes et al. PLOS ONE 7(7): e38586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038586 |
“Cinematic rendering produces volume rendered images with photorealistic image quality. It uses a global illumination model, which takes direct and indirect illumination into account when constructing an image, to achieve rendering quality. The result of the integration is a numerical rendering algorithm known as path tracing: thousands of light rays are traced to compute the resulting image.” MDCT angiography with 3D rendering: A novel cinematic rendering algorithm for enhanced anatomic detail Johnson PT, Schneider R, Lugo-Fagundo C, Johnson M, Fishman EK AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Aug;209(2):309-312. |
“The light model off of which cinematic rendering and classic volume rendering are based when reconstructing the images accounts for the difference between the two technologies. The primary reason why classic volume rendering results in images that are relatively less photorealistic is the use of the local lighting model – only local properties, such as the local gradient, influence the resulting image. Inversely, cinematic rendering assumes the global illumination model, which accounts for the impact that all light rays have on image reproduction.” MDCT angiography with 3D rendering: A novel cinematic rendering algorithm for enhanced anatomic detail Johnson PT, Schneider R, Lugo-Fagundo C, Johnson M, Fishman EK AJR 2017 Aug;209(2):309-312 |
Image Creation: How we do it
|
Trapezoid Creation |
Current Preset Values |
Common Questions
|
Proven Clinical Applications GI Applications
|
Proven Clinical Applications GU Applications
|
Proven Clinical Applications Vascular Applications
|
Proven Clinical Applications Musculoskeletal
|
Cinematic Rendering of the Neck and Role of Shading |
Cinematic Rendering |
Adult T-Cell Lymphoma |