• Smartwatch Use and Physician Well-Being: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Liselotte N Dyrbye, Colin P West, Angelina R Wilton, Daniel V Satele, Arjun P Athreya
    JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2527275. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.27275.

    Abstract

    Importance: Burnout remains prevalent among physicians and can negatively affect quality, safety, and cost of patient care. Few randomized studies on interventions to address burnout have been conducted to date.

    Objective: To determine whether wearing a smartwatch and having access to its physiological data (eg, sleep, step count, and heart rate) improves physician well-being (and if so, which dimensions of well-being).

    Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial included physicians at 2 US medical centers (Mayo Clinic and the University of Colorado School of Medicine) who volunteered to wear a provided smartwatch beginning June 7, 2023. The study concluded on June 27, 2024.

    Intervention: Six months of wearing a smartwatch.

    Main outcomes and measures: Burnout, resilience, quality of life, depressive symptoms, stress, and sleepiness were measured using validated scales. Participants completed electronic surveys at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted.

    Results: This study included 184 physicians (mean [SD] age, 37.5 [9.3] years; 107 females [58.8%]). A total of 83 of 183 physicians (45.4%) were residents or fellows, 103 of 184 (56.0%) lived in Colorado, and 99 of 182 (54.4%) worked in non-primary care settings. Baseline levels of well-being across the measured dimensions were similar for the 2 study arms. At 6 months, 35 of 85 physicians (41.2%) in the intervention arm had burnout compared with 46 of 91 (50.5%) in the control arm (P = .21). Mean (SD) resilience scores at 6 months were 31.9 (5.0) and 29.5 (6.2) among physicians in the intervention and control arms, respectively (P = .01). In multivariable analysis adjusting for baseline score, demographics, specialty, and work hours, the prevalence of burnout was lower (odds ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.21-0.99]; P = .046) and mean resilience score was higher (parameter estimate [scale, 0-40], 1.20 points [95% CI, 0.11-2.28 points]; P = .03; Cohen d = 0.17) among physicians in the intervention arm vs the control arm after 6 months.

    Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of wearing a smartwatch and having access to its physiological data on physician well-being, physicians who wore a smartwatch experienced improvements in burnout and resilience. Future research should explore whether engagement with smartwatch data leads to actual behavior change (eg, adaptive coping or reflective habits) that reduces burnout risk and enhances resilience.