Radiology: Volume 249: Number 1—October 2008
Paul Stolzmann, MD Sebastian Leschka, MD Hans Scheffel, MD Tobias Krauss, MD Lotus Desbiolles, MD Andre Plass, MD Michele Genoni, MD Thomas G. FIohr, PhD Simon Wildermuth, MD Borut Marincek, MD Hatem Alkadhi, MD
Purpose: To prospectively investigate computed tomographic (CT) image quality parameters by using different protocols and to calculate radiation dose estimates for noninvasive coronary angiography performed with dual-source CT in the step-and-shoot (SAS) mode.
Materials and Methods: This study was local ethics board approved; written informed consent was obtained from all patients. In the preliminary portion of the study, 40 patients underwent CT coronary angiography in the SAS mode: at 100 kV (protocol A) in 22 patients with a body mass index (BMI) of less than 25 kg/m2 and at 120 kV (protocol B) in 18 patients with a BMI of 25-30 kg/m2. Both protocols involved use of an attenuation-based tube current and 1 mL of contrast material per kilogram of body weight. The final portion of the study involved 50 additional patients: 21 patients with a BMI of 25-30 kg/cm2 assigned to protocol B and 29 patients with a BMI of less than 25 kg/cm2 assigned to protocol C, which was performed with 100 kV, an attenuation-based tube current, and a reduced contrast material dose of 0.8 mL/kg. Image quality was independently assessed. Attenuation in the aorta and coronary arteries and image noise were measured. Badiation dose was estimated.
Results: Mean image noise was similar with protocols A and B. Mean attenuation in the aorta and coronary arteries with protocol A (444 HU) was significantly (P < .001) higher than that with protocol B (358 HU). The reduced contrast material dose in protocol C yielded attenuation similar to that with protocol B. Diagnostic image quality was achieved with all protocols in 1237 (97.9%) of 1264 coronary segments. No significant differences in image quality between the 100- and 120-kV protocols were found. Mean heart rate had a significant effect on motion artifacts (area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.818; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.723, 0.892; P < .001), whereas heart rate variability had a significant effect on stair-step artifacts (AUC = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.687, 0.865; P < .001). The mean estimated effective dose was 1.2 mSv ± 0.2 for protocols A and C and 2.6 mSv ± 0.5 for protocol B.
Conclusion: Dual-source SAS-mode CT coronary angiography yielded diagnostic image quality for 97.9% of coronary segments at a low radiation dose.