| Specific Anatomic Region | Acetabulum/Pelvis | |
| Application | Evaluate suspected fracture | |
| Author | Fishman EK | |
| Reference Source | Personal Communication | |
| Scanner Used | Siemens Plus4 Volume Zoom | |
| KV / mAs / Time per Rotation (sec) | 140/270/1 or 120/200/ .5 | |
| Detector Collimation (mm) | 1 | |
| Slice Thickness (mm) | 1.25 | |
| Data Reconstruction Interval (mm) | 1 or 2 | |
| Table Speed (mm per rotation) / Pitch | 5/5 or 6/6 | |
| Oral Contrast | N/A | |
| IV Contrast Volume and Type | (if indicated) 120 cc of Omnipaque 350 | |
| Injection Rate | 2 or 3 cc/sec | |
| Scan Delay (sec) | 30 or 60 sec | |
| 3D Technique Used | Volume rendering | |
| Comment: In many cases of isolated pelvic injury, a noncontrast study is satisfactory. If, however, the possibility of vascular or bladder injury is suspected, then the protocol should be done with IV contrast, and a CT angiogram can also be done. | ||