Harris GE Siemens
CTisUS Sponsers
Journal Club
  • Digital Subtraction CT Angiography for Detection of Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparison with Three-dimensional Digital Subtraction Angiography

    Radiology: Volume 262: Number 2-February 2012

    Li Lu, MS Long Jiang Zhang, MD, PhD Colin S. Poon, MD, PhD, FRCPC Sheng Yong Wu, MD Chang Sheng Zhou, BS Song Luo, BS Mei Wang, MS Guang Ming Lu, MD

    Purpose: To/evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of digital subtraction com­puted tomographic (CT) angiography in the detection of in­tracranial aneurysms compared with three-dimensional (3D) rotational digital subtraction angiography (DSA), as reference standard, in a large cohort in a single center.

    Materials and Methods: The study was waived by the institutional review board be­cause of its retrospective nature. A total of 513 patients clinically suspected of having or with known intracranial aneurysms and other cerebral vascular diseases underwent both digital subtraction CT angiography with a dual-source CT scanner and 3D DSA, with a median interval of 1 day; 436 patients (84.9%) had acute subarachnoid hemorrhage at presentation. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of digital subtraction CT angiography in depicting aneurysm were analyzed on a per-patient and per-aneurysm basis, with 3D DSA as the reference standard. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of digital subtraction CT angiography in depict­ing aneurysms of different diameter (ie, < 3 mm, 3-5 mm, 5-10 mm, and >10 mm) and of aneurysms at different lo­cations in the anterior and posterior circulation were calcu­lated. Kappa statistics were calculated to quantify inter- and intrareader variability in detecting aneurysms by using digital subtraction CT angiography for 100 patients.

    Results: Of 513 patients, 106 (20.7%) had no aneurysms, while 407 pa­tients (79.3%) had 459 aneurysms at 3D DSA. Digital subtrac­tion CT angiography correctly depicted 456 (99.3%) of the 459 aneurysms. By using 3D DSA as the standard of reference, the sensitivity and specificity of depicting intracranial aneurysms were 97.8% (398 of 407) and 88.7% (94 of 106), respectively, on a per-patient basis, and 96.5% (443 of 459) and 87.8% (94 of 107), respectively, on a per-aneurysm basis. Digital sub­traction CT angiography had sensitivities of 91.3% (42 of 46), 94.0% (140 of 149), 98.4% (186 of 189), and 100% (75 of 75) in depicting aneurysms of less than 3 mm, between 3 mm but less than 5 mm, between 5 mm but less than 10 mm, and 10 mm or greater, respectively, and of 95.8% (276 of 288) and 97.7% (167 of 171) in depicting anterior circulation and posterior circulation aneurysms, respectively. Excellent inter- and intrareader agreement was found on a per-patient (k = 0.900 and 0.939, both P < .001) and per-aneurysm basis (k = 0.846 and 0.921, both P < .001) for the detection of intra­cranial aneurysms with digital subtraction CT angiography.

    Conclusion: Digital subtraction CT angiography has a high sensitivity and specificity in depicting intracranial aneurysms with different sizes and at different locations, compared with 3D DSA.